前几天我介绍了一个小的codex不断蒸馏自己的提示词，文章看这里：
Codex隐藏神技：一句提示词自动蒸馏你自己，让日常重复工作全自动化
这个提示词比较粗糙，执行起来可能会有很多问题
今天codex 团队的Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav分享了更完整的执行性更高的提示词
总体思想是让 Codex 回顾你的会话、Memories 和 Chronicle，识别其中的模式，复用已有内容，并且只创建最小但有用的技能、子代理或自动化。
但是这个提示词还会不断往前发展，有了更好的版本我会持续分享
提示词如下
复制粘贴以下提示词到codex就行（记得打开Chronicle），可以边用边实践，不满意的话，可以让codex删除就行。
回顾我最近 30 天的工作；如果可用历史少于 30 天，就回顾全部可用历史，找出值得打包的重复性手动流程。
按以下优先顺序使用可用证据：
• 最近的 Codex 会话和任务摘要。 • Codex Memories 和 rollout 摘要，用来发现跨会话重复出现的模式。 • 如果启用了 Chronicle，用它来发现 Codex 之外的重复工作。Chronicle 仅用于发现；重要细节尽可能回到相关源系统中确认。 • 现有技能、自定义代理和自动化，优先复用或扩展已有内容，避免重复创建。
广泛寻找那些重复、耗时、容易出错、上下文负担重，或受益于一致流程的工作。范围包括编码、研究、写作、规划、沟通、运营、分析和个人事务管理等。
只有当候选项满足以下条件时才采取行动：
• 至少发生过两次，或明显很可能再次发生且重复成本较高； • 输入稳定、流程可重复，并且有明确产出或停止条件； • 能明显提升速度、质量、一致性或可靠性； • 尚未被现有内容充分覆盖。
选择最小且合适的形式：
• Skill：可复用的流程或操作手册。 • Custom subAgent：适合委派的边界清晰的专家角色或调查任务。 • Automation：定时或重复执行的检查、报告、提醒或监控。 • Skip：过于一次性、模糊、敏感，或证据不足、不适合打包的工作。
先生成一份简洁候选清单，包含：
• 重复工作流 • 支持证据和日期 • 频率/置信度 • 推荐形式：skill、subagent、automation、extend existing 或 skip • 为什么值得或不值得创建
然后只创建高置信度且缺失的项目。保持范围窄、实用、能感知来源，并且易于验证。不要创建猜测性的、重叠的或过于宽泛的资产。
最后总结：
• 你创建或扩展了什么 • 你有意跳过了什么 • 哪些内容需要更多证据后再打包”
英文版
Ask Codex to look across your sessions, Memories, and Chronicle, identify patterns, reuse what already exists, and only create the smallest useful skill, subagent, or automation.
"Look back over my recent work from the last 30 days, or all available history if shorter, and identify repeated manual workflows worth packaging.
Use available evidence in this order:
- Recent Codex sessions and task summaries.
- Codex Memories and rollout summaries to find patterns repeated across sessions.
- Chronicle, if enabled, to spot repeated work outside Codex. Use Chronicle for discovery only; confirm important details in the relevant source system when possible.
- Existing skills, custom agents, and automations, so you reuse or extend what already exists instead of duplicating it.
Look broadly for work that is repeated, time-consuming, error-prone, context-heavy, or benefits from a consistent process. Include workflows across coding, research, writing, planning, communication, operations, analysis, and personal administration.
Only act on a candidate when it:
- occurred at least twice, or is clearly likely to recur and costly to repeat;
- has stable inputs, a repeatable procedure, and a clear output or stopping condition;
- would materially improve speed, quality, consistency, or reliability;
- is not already adequately covered.
Choose the smallest appropriate form:
- Skill: a reusable workflow or playbook.
- Custom subagent: a bounded specialist role or investigation task suitable for delegation.
- Automation: a scheduled or recurring check, report, reminder, or monitor.
- Skip: work that is too one-off, ambiguous, sensitive, or poorly evidenced to package.
First produce a compact shortlist with:
- repeated workflow
- supporting evidence and dates
- frequency/confidence
- recommended form: skill, subagent, automation, extend existing, or skip
- why it is or is not worth creating
Then create only the high-confidence missing items. Keep them narrow, practical, source-aware, and easy to validate. Do not create speculative, overlapping, or overly broad assets.
Finish with:
- what you created or extended
- what you deliberately skipped
- what needs more evidence before packaging"
--end--
